| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote:
"Tarmo Tammaru" wrote It might be worthwhile explaining how they came up with Gamma max = 2.414, instead of some huge number. They say that the phase angle of Zo is constrained to +/- 45 degrees for R, G, L, and C non-negative. ================================= Tam, who are "They" ? Are "they" the "One million housewives who can't be wrong" ? Or might it be Oliver Heaviside around 1872 ? It doesn't matter who says so - the only thing that matters is that the result is correct. The same correct result is always there, to be found by anybody who can. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
| Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna | |||