Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:39:25 -0700, W5DXP
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: W5DXP wrote: My basic approach is to achieve a Z0-match and therefore forget about source impedance. This is a cavalier attitude if you can afford it. It's all part of my "Work Smarter, Not Harder" nature. The elimination of reflected energy incident upon the source is extremely rewarding in multiple ways. Hi Cecil, If smarter were hotter, then you could toast bread at 10 feet. Casting back ten watts by burning 20 hardly qualifies for more. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna |