Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:22:55 -0700, W5DXP
wrote: I guess I don't understand any of the above. Coherency just means the signals are of the identical frequency. Coherency doesn't specify phase. The phase of a reflected wave can be anything depending on feedline length and load. Hi Cecil, This shows the lack of your "optics." A laser which amplifies by virtue of coherency, consists of a phase locked aggregation of what would have been incoherent illuminations. It would be an LED otherwise. As I have said for quite a while now, it is a simple matter of interference math. Such math shows everything of coherency or differences. A coherent signal, is by definition of the same frequency of another who matches that coherency. To put it ironically, the challenge I offer is deliberately incoherent to give that math a deliberate solution that is other than the result of simple addition or subtraction. 73's, Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna |