LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 29th 03, 07:27 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:27:09 -0700, W5DXP
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
You have expended far more time climbing Everest in search of the
guru, than simply doing the challenge at the bench.


I don't understand the challenge. Until I do, I would be wasting
my time on the bench. I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't
understand what you are trying to say.


Hi Cecil,

Yes, it is terribly cryptic: how much heat is lost in the line?

It requires advanced techniques in measuring power lost over a known
stretch of transmission line. This is an art unknown to many here and
baffles them in how to proceed when written directions are provided.

Even if they reject those methods and directions, they struggle
through massive tomes to come to no conclusion. What's more, the
example resides in one of their cherished scriptures that many would
swear by and would scream outrage at the suggestion that they might
read it.

The irony is delicious.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) Dr. Slick Antenna 98 August 30th 03 03:09 AM
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... Peter O. Brackett Antenna 8 August 28th 03 06:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017