Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My suggestion to you: double- or triple-check your postings for easy
stuff like typo's. We did, but with having to create and run over 100 EZNEC models, document same in a 40+ page technical write-up, do two other technical write-ups, plan the BPL field-trial testing, do the BPL field-trial testing, all on the fastest fuse I have ever seen the FCC put a major issue on, it was inevitable that small errors crept in. Every single publication I know, ARRL or other, contains errors. The fumble-fingered typing of 115 where 135 was intended is just not something that would have been caught in a proofreader's read. 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math a Blunder? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |