Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 30th 03, 01:47 PM
W1RFI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My suggestion to you: double- or triple-check your postings for easy
stuff like typo's.


We did, but with having to create and run over 100 EZNEC models, document same
in a 40+ page technical write-up, do two other technical write-ups, plan the
BPL field-trial testing, do the BPL field-trial testing, all on the fastest
fuse I have ever seen the FCC put a major issue on, it was inevitable that
small errors crept in. Every single publication I know, ARRL or other, contains
errors. The fumble-fingered typing of 115 where 135 was intended is just not
something that would have been caught in a proofreader's read.

73,
Ed Hare, W1RFI



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) Dr. Slick Antenna 183 October 2nd 20 11:44 AM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 11:06 PM
Cecil's Math a Blunder? Jim Kelley Antenna 23 July 28th 03 11:51 AM
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited Richard Clark Antenna 11 July 24th 03 08:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017