Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 9th 03, 01:03 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

pez wrote:
Dear Mr. Roy Lewallen, There is no doubt
your numerical example is a correct one.


What about Roy's refusal to superpose like terms? With only
two directions in a transmission line, it is impossible for
there to exist a "third term" when there's no third possible
direction.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 9th 03, 04:23 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I make no attempt sort out what your particular problem is.

But 3 loss terms can exist.

If rho1 occurs between generator and line and rho2 occurs between line and
load, and rho3 occurs between generator and load before the line is
inserted.

Then -

Log(rho1) + Log(rho2) - Log(rho3)

Or something like that. If this doesn't ring any bells then forget it.


  #3   Report Post  
Old September 11th 03, 11:23 AM
pez
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dear Mr. Cecil Moore,

I have already express my point of view
on this matter in another thread so
I can't do something more than to repeat a part of it, he

-
| But when there is such a steadfast loyalty
| to the existence of some kind of
| "interference"
| between two,
| rather clearly distinct waves,
| the incident and the reflected one,
| it is difficult for anybody
| to compromise himself and accept
| that the same two waves,
| so clearly distinct until now,
| when are coming along a line with complex Z0,
| have to bear in addition
| some kind of
|"interaction".
| -
| Very difficult, indeed.
-

Needless to say it,
but
I imply that I am the very one
who find it very difficult.

Sincerely yours,

pez
SV7BAX


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ...
| pez wrote:
| Dear Mr. Roy Lewallen, There is no doubt
| your numerical example is a correct one.
|
| What about Roy's refusal to superpose like terms? With only
| two directions in a transmission line, it is impossible for
| there to exist a "third term" when there's no third possible
| direction.
| --
| 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
|
|
|
| -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
| http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
| -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 11:06 PM
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit Dr. Slick Antenna 126 September 10th 03 05:26 PM
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) Dr. Slick Antenna 98 August 30th 03 04:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017