| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
September 9th 03, 12:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
pez wrote:
Dear Mr. Roy Lewallen, There is no doubt your numerical example is a correct one. What about Roy's refusal to superpose like terms? With only two directions in a transmission line, it is impossible for there to exist a "third term" when there's no third possible direction. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
| Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
