Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy and others,
Just a suggestion, don't place all your faith for this kind of work in old, unknown, unproven, untrustworthy line-transmission calculating programs, written in languages like insecure modifiable Basic, spreadsheets, etc., you find lying around on the net. Use programs COAXPAIR and RJELINE3 (balanced lines) for exact classical analysis. For example, proximity effect in close-spaced balanced lines is taken into account. Bugs, if any exist, are likely to result in obvious catastrophic errors. After several years no bugs have come to light. As with all human endeavour, hardware or software, Reliability is Quality versus Time. ---- Go to http://www.g4fgq.com ======================= PS: Very recently there's been a migration from the usual 'holy saints' towards worship of the hitherto relatively unknown out-of-print works of Chipman. Having had his book since shortly after he wrote it I can assure you he is not infallible. But I hasten to add his few paragraphs about magnitude of voltage and current reflection coefficients being greater than unity seem OK. Well recommended. I wonder if the old timer is still around? The only error-free book of the very few I still have in my possession is by W.L.Everitt who in 1937 showed how to calculate the internal resistance of Class-A, B and C, RF power ampliers, a simple subject, apparently disregarded by Terman as being of no consequence, but which has generated an enormous amount of heat amongst radio 'amateurs' in this newsgroup during the last few years and is still simmering like molten lava under the surface. ---- Reg. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Re-Normalizing the Smith Chart (Changing the SWR into the same load) | Antenna |