Roy Lewallen wrote:

No, no, Cecil. *You* need to include all the separate voltages and
currents, to show us.

Do you think I am capable of inventing something so complex just to
pull your leg, Roy? What I am saying is grounded in physics. You
simply made a simple mistake in assuming one term was forward voltage
when actually, there are two terms when added together, yield the
forward voltage. You didn't realize that you were doing a 2-port
analysis.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----