Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Cecil and others, even authors of books, have said -
- - - - |rho|^2 cannot be greater than 1.0 - - - - ==================================== Would you change your minds if I describe a reflection-coefficient bridge, which anybody can construct, which accurately measures values of | rho | up to its greatest possible value in transmission lines of 2.414 There's no catch! For some reason Dr Slick has remained silent to my acceptance of his challenge to find such an instrument. Perhaps he's gone away to think about it. --- Reg, G4FGQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna |