LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 03, 11:49 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So do it right and show us how it really should be done.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Cecil Moore wrote:

You obviously did a something-parameter analysis (maybe a z-parameter
analysis?). Whatever you did results in four power terms, not two plus
a third. When you introduced 'x' you introduced an analysis that produces
a reflected wave on each side of 'x' and a forward wave on each side of
'x'. That's four waves. You went too far when you combined two of those
waves into one especially since one is a forward wave and one is a
reflected wave.




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) David or Jo Anne Ryeburn Antenna 17 December 13th 03 10:48 AM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit Dr. Slick Antenna 126 September 10th 03 04:26 PM
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... Peter O. Brackett Antenna 8 August 28th 03 06:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017