Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So do it right and show us how it really should be done.
Roy Lewallen, W7EL Cecil Moore wrote: You obviously did a something-parameter analysis (maybe a z-parameter analysis?). Whatever you did results in four power terms, not two plus a third. When you introduced 'x' you introduced an analysis that produces a reflected wave on each side of 'x' and a forward wave on each side of 'x'. That's four waves. You went too far when you combined two of those waves into one especially since one is a forward wave and one is a reflected wave. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna |