Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Robbins wrote:
btw, for whom ever has it... i am still waiting to see the derivation of the conjugate rho formula. i published one on here for the 'classical' version, where is the other one??? It exists in the Kurokawa paper, "Power Waves and the Scattering Matrix". He defines a new kind of wave, different from traveling waves, and calls them "Power Waves". That conjugate term is apparently the result of this new definition of waves. He says, "... when the main interest is in the relation between various circuits in which the sources are uncorrelated, the traveling waves are not considered as the best independent variables to use for the analysis." Seems he is not talking about a system where all the waves are coherent and has defined a new concept of a "Power Wave" which includes an alternate definition of a reflection coefficient which includes a conjugate term. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna |