Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
On 3 Sep 2003 23:16:39 -0700, (Dr. Slick) wrote: I think Reg put it best: Hi OM, If you are going to quote him as an authority supporting you, you should at least accept his offer of a bridge to settle this hash shouldn't you? You can't run far on one legged stilts. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Who ever said he was an authority? All he did was open up a can-o-worms by showing how the "normal" Gamma equation is not always less than 1 for passive networks, which is good because i wouldn't have found out about the correct conjugate equation (when Zo is complex). But it is wise to pick and choose your fights, eh? And i'd rather argue with someone who is making sense at any particular point in time. Show us a passive circuit that reflects more power than you feed it (incident), on my Daiwa meter, and i will be VERY impressed. I'm be waiting a long time for that schematic.... Slick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna |