| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#38
September 6th 03, 12:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Dr. Slick wrote:
But his original formulas for ai and bi (incident and reflected voltage waves) are quite confusing in terms of subscripts, and he doesn't show us the derivation for the conjugate RC formula, unfortunately. He has simply invented a new model. There are a lot of them. From now on, go through a binary decision tree to see if someone is repeating the past or is offering something new. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Calculus not needed (was: Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit) | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
| Mother Nature's reflection coefficient... | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
