| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dr. Slick" wrote in message om... "David Robbins" wrote in message ... Please show us if he correctly defines formula (1) and why. And i'd also like to see if someone can derive these: ai= (Vi+Zi*Ii)/(2*sqrt(Re(Zi)) bi= (Vi-conj(Zi)*Ii)/(2*sqrt(Re(Zi)) For what he calls the incident and reflected power waves. re-read my reply above until you understand it... (1) is GIVEN, it is the starting point, he DEFINED ai and bi to be those values... the then goes on for several paragraphs explaining why he thinks those are better waves than other types of waves. Well, I certainly didn't expect you to provide the derivation, but maybe someone else can. no, no one can derive something that is defined... it is a given. it is the author's choice to define waves the way he wants, and then to define whatever he wants to all his reflection coefficient from those waves. that does not mean it can be generalized to other waves. the waves defined that result in the normal reflection coefficient happen to be a simple solution to a second order partial differential equation that results when you analyze the voltage or current waves in a transmission line.... a different type of wave, requiring a different reflection coefficient... and never the twain shall meet! |