LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 9th 03, 11:14 PM
David Robbins
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dr. Slick" wrote in message
om...
"David Robbins" wrote in message

...


Please show us if he correctly defines formula (1) and why. And

i'd
also
like to see if someone can derive these:

ai= (Vi+Zi*Ii)/(2*sqrt(Re(Zi))
bi= (Vi-conj(Zi)*Ii)/(2*sqrt(Re(Zi))

For what he calls the incident and reflected power waves.


re-read my reply above until you understand it... (1) is GIVEN, it is

the
starting point, he DEFINED ai and bi to be those values... the then goes

on
for several paragraphs explaining why he thinks those are better waves

than
other types of waves.



Well, I certainly didn't expect you to provide the derivation,
but maybe someone else can.

no, no one can derive something that is defined... it is a given. it is the
author's choice to define waves the way he wants, and then to define
whatever he wants to all his reflection coefficient from those waves. that
does not mean it can be generalized to other waves. the waves defined that
result in the normal reflection coefficient happen to be a simple solution
to a second order partial differential equation that results when you
analyze the voltage or current waves in a transmission line.... a different
type of wave, requiring a different reflection coefficient... and never the
twain shall meet!


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017