"David Robbins" wrote in message ...
"David Robbins" wrote in message
...

i think the more important thing now is to point out to the arrl the error
of using that form of the reflection coefficient in place of the
'conventional' one in the latest antenna book so it doesn't become gospel
in
the future.


Conventional RC formula is fine, just assume Zo is purely real,
which is what you almost always do anyways.


Slick