Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
I showed in the analysis that the "forward power" can be less than the "reverse power", while still delivering net power to the load. Cool, huh? Actually pretty uncool. That's what happens when you don't deal with total average powers. You can come up with apparent violations of the conservation of energy principle that don't actually exist in reality. Your "forward power" is simply not all of the forward power. Just as explained in Dr. Best's QEX article, the constructive/destructive interference terms must also be taken into account. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |