Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
But when there's an alternative model that works whenever yours does,
and still works when yours doesn't, I'll use that one thank you.

Do you use a calculator for 2 x 3 because you need one for
2.34 x 3.45? You are wasting your life if you use Maxwell's
equations for simple EM problems.

Work smarter, not harder!
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Cecil Moore wrote:
Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
But when there's an alternative model that works whenever yours does,
and still works when yours doesn't, I'll use that one thank you.

Do you use a calculator for 2 x 3 because you need one for
2.34 x 3.45? You are wasting your life if you use Maxwell's
equations for simple EM problems.

Work smarter, not harder!

The smart way is to use the tool that *always* works - especially when
it's no harder to use.

It's not smart to use a tool that only works some of the time *and* has
nothing extra to offer.


--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek

Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
The smart way is to use the tool that *always* works - especially when
it's no harder to use.

It's not smart to use a tool that only works some of the time *and* has
nothing extra to offer.

The something extra is simplicity. The equations for a small loop, for
instance, are not the full equations but a simplified version. Virtually
all of our often-used equations are simplified versions.

Every electronic instrument we use only works some of the time.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----