Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote:
Thus it follows your negative that doesn't exist in your own formula, doesn't exist as a figment of someone else's over-indulgent imagination. I already said as much. The sign of the reflection coefficient has absolutely nothing to do with negative power. The sign of the reflection coefficient is simply a math convention where -1 at zero degrees equals +1 at 180 degrees. You are still at a loss to respond to the post, ... Exactly where does Chipman talk about reflections from the source? As far as I can tell, the concept of reflections from the source originated with you, not with Chipman. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|