Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:18:39 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: You are still at a loss to respond to the post, ... Exactly where does Chipman talk about reflections from the source? As far as I can tell, the concept of reflections from the source originated with you, not with Chipman. Hi Cecil, You deliberately isolate my complaint, and then entirely ignore it. Does this give you some insight into you being observed as an unreliable correspondent? Is it so difficult to search Google to find the actual post that you claim you can quote from memory (sic)? If you do find it difficult, what makes me think you have the library research skills to find any printed material to a citation? Your inability to quote or follow Chipman's work is equal in the poor treatment you post in regards to Optics here, a field you are so naive about, and so terribly unfamiliar with, you cannot even perform the simplest of field solutions. This is indeed the price and evidence of your career in binary electronics. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|