wrote:
It is only true for the special case of single frequency sinusoidal
waveforms.

Which is the general case for a key-down ham transmitter.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Cecil Moore wrote:

wrote:
It is only true for the special case of single frequency sinusoidal
waveforms.

Which is the general case for a key-down ham transmitter.

It is indeed the usual case, but limiting your thinking to the
usual case reduces your opportunity for understanding.

Believing too strongly in the usual case will inhibit your
ability to understand when you begin to explore more
general cases. First you will have to unlearn your beliefs.
If you have repeated them to yourself for too long without
understanding their limitations, you can find it very difficult
to let go of them even when they no longer serve.

It is therefore useful to occasionally remind yourself of
the limitations applicable to your assertions.

....Keith

wrote:

Cecil Moore wrote:

wrote:
It is only true for the special case of single frequency sinusoidal
waveforms.

Which is the general case for a key-down ham transmitter.

It is indeed the usual case, but limiting your thinking to the
usual case reduces your opportunity for understanding.

Can you give me an example of a key-down CW transmitter that is not
single frequency sinusoidal waveforms?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----