Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:40:27 GMT, Walter Maxwell wrote:
This concept is foreign to me, so if I'm wrong I'd like to have some proof that the source impedance can have any influence on SWR. Walt Hi Walt, I have not seen any correspondence from you. However, as to proof, that has been tendered to you, you simply lack the facilities to test it at this time. That much has already been established and further elaboration is unnecessary. Debate can continue without resolution, a simple hour's work at the bench can put the cap to it. My data stands un-refuted (barring the usual cackle of nay-saying sneer review), and even more, without test at ANY other bench. I can only conclude that: 1.) My data is bullet-proof; 2.) others lack the ability to perform the task; 3.) 1&2 above, but narcissistic debate is the real focus of critics. The triumph of the nay-sayers is in my admission that I know that I am in error. They undoubtedly grasp that statement as the chalice of their noble musings leaving them undisturbed to step up to the bench. It also is revealed in their piteous cries of the calamity of Amateur Radio's future that awaits us. This last comes as no surprise to the rising tide in the kulture of institutionalized ignorance where the supreme technical achievement is enacted by pushing a credit card across the display case. I am bound to be in error through my own admission, but my admission comes with a bounds of accuracy. To others here, my error is absolute and demonstration to attest that is unnecessary. This unsullied nobility is then undercut by the jejune debate they indulge in over issues of a philosophical nature - actually a mystical assignation with metaphysics. I suppose I frustrate many because I am not afraid to be wrong. The frustration is often railed in terms of my style (their being outgunned on two fronts) and compounded by their inertia for doing simple things well (the loss of yet another, third front). You guys need more threads devoted to the definition of weight so you can devastate the farmer's mud-logic. ;-) 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|