Richard Clark wrote:
No further analysis is required, it has been performed and data
taken has demonstrated it.

Nuff said! Guess that settles it - and you don't want or need to
understand the underlying physics. Why do you keep posting?

If you choose to put forward a variant employing reactance, you could
at least step up to the bench to offer confirmatory or rejecting
evidence as I did.

I don't understand how to set up your experiment. Your verbal
description was extremely confusing. How about a decent diagram?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----