Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc H.Popek" wrote in message ... www.fwt.niat.net This dielectric embedded antennas are smaller than naturally occurs and yet have a net gain More correctly, they CLAIM a gain, relative to isotropic. If the antenna is smaller than a free space antenna, then it looses capture area. I would be very interested to know how they recoup that. I suspect these antennas might need some power to drive an on-board amplifier, which means that their gain claim is bogus, and what they aren't telling you is that the noise floor comes up also. TANSTAAFL. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
EH antenna, FCC certification is arrived | Antenna | |||
Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna | |||
Compact HF antenna (RX-only) for reference in antenna tests? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |