Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need to understand more about capture area effective area etc.
The Bogus gain is relatively easy to measure, open field, sig generator two standard dipoles and then compare with the FWT OR two FWT's antennas on same range and use Friis equation to predict expected isotropic, then you compare with what your DUT performs ... It really has the gain we claim, sir! "Dave VanHorn" wrote in message ... "Marc H.Popek" wrote in message ... www.fwt.niat.net This dielectric embedded antennas are smaller than naturally occurs and yet have a net gain More correctly, they CLAIM a gain, relative to isotropic. If the antenna is smaller than a free space antenna, then it looses capture area. I would be very interested to know how they recoup that. I suspect these antennas might need some power to drive an on-board amplifier, which means that their gain claim is bogus, and what they aren't telling you is that the noise floor comes up also. TANSTAAFL. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
EH antenna, FCC certification is arrived | Antenna | |||
Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna | |||
Compact HF antenna (RX-only) for reference in antenna tests? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |