Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 17th 03, 08:54 PM
William E. Sabin
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dilon Earl wrote:

Bill;
Thanks, that all makes sense. Can you consider a Transmitter to
have an internal resistance like the generator that changes with the
plate and tune controls?
If I have a 100 watt transmitter and my wattmeter shows 3 watts
reflected. Is 3 watts actually being dissipated in the tank and final
PA?


No.

If the transmitter output is 100 W and the
reflected power is 3 W, then the 100 W is the
difference between 100+3=103 W (forward power) and
3 W (reflected power).

The question "where does the reflected power go?"
never seems to have an acceptable answer. Very
strange.

A good way to look at is as follows: The junction
of the transmitter output jack and the coax to the
antenna is a "node", which is just a "point" or
"location" where the jack and the coax meet. At
this node the voltage is exactly equal to the
voltage output of the amplifier (VPA) and also the
voltage across the input of the coax (VCOAX). The
voltage VCOAX) across the coax is equal to the
phasor sum of a forward voltage wave that travels
toward the antenna and a reverse voltage wave that
is traveling from the antenna backward toward the
transmitter.

Also, at the node, IPA is the current from the PA
and ICOAX is the phasor sum of a current wave that
travels to the antenna and a return current wave
that travels toward the transmitter.

At the node, the IPA current and the ICOAX current
are exactly equal and in the same direction
(toward the antenna). At the node the IPA current
is equal to the ICOAX coax forward current minus
the ICOAX reflected current. In other words there
is an *EQUILIBRIUM* at the node between VPA
voltage and VCOAX voltage, and an *EQUILIBRIUM*
between IPA current and ICOAX (forward and
reflected) current.

This explanation accounts for everything that is
going on at the node. The answer to the question
"where does the reflected power go?" is the
following: "It is a nonsense question that has
caused nothing but misery". The reflected power
does not actually *GO* anywhere. The correct
answer is that forward and reflected coax waves
always combine precisely and exactly with the
voltage and current that is delivered by the PA.
The voltage and current at the junction are
correctly accounted for. The basic principles here
are Kirchhoff's voltage law and Kirchhoff's
current law, as applied to the node. You can study
Kirchhoff's laws in the textbooks.

If we apply these laws and calculate the 100 W
power out of the PA and the 100 W power that is
dumped into the coax, they are exactly equal. They
cannot possibly be unequal. The power delivered is
the real part of the product of VPA and IPA (100
W), which is identical to the real part of the
product of VCOAX and ICOAX (100 W).

Observe carefully the following: We do not need to
know anything about the PA and its circuitry. The
PA is nothing more than an anonymous "black box".
In other words, any 100 W (output) PA will perform
exactly as I have described.

Bill W0IYH



  #2   Report Post  
Old July 17th 03, 11:42 PM
W5DXP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

William E. Sabin wrote:
If the transmitter output is 100 W and the reflected power is 3 W, then
the 100 W is the difference between 100+3=103 W (forward power) and 3 W
(reflected power).


If the source is a signal generator equipped with a circulator and
load, the generator is putting out 103 watts, and the circulator
load is dissipating 3 watts, is the generator still only putting
out 100 watts by definition?
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP

  #3   Report Post  
Old July 18th 03, 01:00 AM
Dilon Earl
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:42:37 -0700, W5DXP
wrote:

William E. Sabin wrote:
If the transmitter output is 100 W and the reflected power is 3 W, then
the 100 W is the difference between 100+3=103 W (forward power) and 3 W
(reflected power).


If the source is a signal generator equipped with a circulator and
load, the generator is putting out 103 watts, and the circulator
load is dissipating 3 watts, is the generator still only putting
out 100 watts by definition?


No, you just said it was putting 103 watts.. :-)

Was that the right answer?


  #4   Report Post  
Old July 18th 03, 09:57 PM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default

W5DXP wrote:

William E. Sabin wrote:
If the transmitter output is 100 W and the reflected power is 3 W, then
the 100 W is the difference between 100+3=103 W (forward power) and 3 W
(reflected power).


If the source is a signal generator equipped with a circulator and
load, the generator is putting out 103 watts, and the circulator
load is dissipating 3 watts, is the generator still only putting
out 100 watts by definition?


If the sig gen is putting out 100 watts, with 3 watts reflected and 97
watts going to the load, then 3 watts must be going to the circulator.
If 100 watts is going to the load and 3 watts is reflected back to the
circulator, then the sig gen is putting out 103 watts. But if 97 watts
is getting to the load, 3 watts is reflected and there is no circulator
or other load, then how much do you think the sig gen is actually
putting out?

73, ac6xg
  #5   Report Post  
Old July 19th 03, 05:38 AM
W5DXP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Kelley wrote:
If the sig gen is putting out 100 watts, with 3 watts reflected and 97
watts going to the load, ...


The forward power is 103 watts and the reflected power is 3 watts in
the given example. The signal generator equipped with a circulator
load is putting out 103 watts.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----


  #6   Report Post  
Old July 18th 03, 03:35 AM
William E. Sabin
 
Posts: n/a
Default

William E. Sabin wrote:
Dilon Earl wrote:


Bill;
Thanks, that all makes sense. Can you consider a Transmitter to
have an internal resistance like the generator that changes with the
plate and tune controls?
If I have a 100 watt transmitter and my wattmeter shows 3 watts
reflected. Is 3 watts actually being dissipated in the tank and final
PA?



No.

If the transmitter output is 100 W and the reflected power is 3 W, then
the 100 W is the difference between 100+3=103 W (forward power) and 3 W
(reflected power).

The question "where does the reflected power go?" never seems to have an
acceptable answer. Very strange.

A good way to look at is as follows: The junction of the transmitter
output jack and the coax to the antenna is a "node", which is just a
"point" or "location" where the jack and the coax meet. At this node the
voltage is exactly equal to the voltage output of the amplifier (VPA)
and also the voltage across the input of the coax (VCOAX). The voltage
VCOAX) across the coax is equal to the phasor sum of a forward voltage
wave that travels toward the antenna and a reverse voltage wave that is
traveling from the antenna backward toward the transmitter.

Also, at the node, IPA is the current from the PA and ICOAX is the
phasor sum of a current wave that travels to the antenna and a return
current wave that travels toward the transmitter.

At the node, the IPA current and the ICOAX current are exactly equal and
in the same direction (toward the antenna). At the node the IPA current
is equal to the ICOAX coax forward current minus the ICOAX reflected
current. In other words there is an *EQUILIBRIUM* at the node between
VPA voltage and VCOAX voltage, and an *EQUILIBRIUM* between IPA current
and ICOAX (forward and reflected) current.

This explanation accounts for everything that is going on at the node.
The answer to the question "where does the reflected power go?" is the
following: "It is a nonsense question that has caused nothing but
misery". The reflected power does not actually *GO* anywhere. The
correct answer is that forward and reflected coax waves always combine
precisely and exactly with the voltage and current that is delivered by
the PA. The voltage and current at the junction are correctly accounted
for. The basic principles here are Kirchhoff's voltage law and
Kirchhoff's current law, as applied to the node. You can study
Kirchhoff's laws in the textbooks.

If we apply these laws and calculate the 100 W power out of the PA and
the 100 W power that is dumped into the coax, they are exactly equal.
They cannot possibly be unequal. The power delivered is the real part of
the product of VPA and IPA (100 W), which is identical to the real part
of the product of VCOAX and ICOAX (100 W).

Observe carefully the following: We do not need to know anything about
the PA and its circuitry. The PA is nothing more than an anonymous
"black box". In other words, any 100 W (output) PA will perform exactly
as I have described.

Bill W0IYH


This discussion assumes that we want the 100 W PA
to actually deliver 100 W to the coax. Assume a
Bird model 43 wattmeter in the line. If the PA is
actually delivering 100 W to the coax, then the
forward power must be 103 W and the reflected
power must be 3 W. The PA output power is
103-3=100 W. This is how we use the Bird
wattmeter. The Bird instruction manual tells us this.

Keeping everything simple and not getting into
peripheral issues is desirable at this point. For
example, a circulator will dissipate the 3 W, but
the above discussion does not assume a circulator.
The circulator's job is to force a 50 ohm load on
the PA, despite the fact that the coax input
impedance is not 50 ohms.

Bill W0IYH

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Conservation of Energy Richard Harrison Antenna 34 July 15th 03 12:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017