Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tarmo Tammaru wrote:
This whole discussion points out the fallacy of trying to understand reflections by sending a CW signal. There is nothing wrong with considering the steady-state solution. We do that all the time. The steady-state is achieved mathematically by considering an infinite sum of forward and reflected waves (for a CW signal) until it converges to a steady state. In the final solution the source impedance is found to have no effect on the standing wave pattern (the SWR). Reference: W.C. Johnson "Transmission Lines and Networks", McGraw-Hill 1950, chapter 4, Equation 4.23. In the steady state the final result is according to my discussion. Bill W0IYH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Conservation of Energy | Antenna |