Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
W5DXP wrote: The answer has been found but most people think they already know everything there is to know. The answer is contained in the following example. The sources are signal generators with circulator loads (SGCL). The (50) or (150) subscript is the ohmic value of the circulator load resistor. The signal generators are phase-locked and can be turned on and off independently. 100W SGCL(50)--1WL 50 ohm feedline--+--1/2WL 150 ohm feedline--33.33W SGCL(150) Pfwd1-- Pfwd2-- --Pref1 --Pref2 Step 1: With the 100W SGCL(50) on and the 33.33W SGCL(150) off, the following conditions exist: Pfwd1 = 100W, Pref1 = 25W, Pfwd2 = 75W, Pref2 = 0W Step 2: Now turn on the 33.33W SGCL(150). At the instant the rearward- traveling signal reaches the impedance discontinuity, the following conditions exist at the discontinuity: Pfwd1 = 100W, Pref1 = 0W, Pfwd2 = 133.33W, Pref2 = 33.33W All anyone has to do is figure out what happened to Pref1 = 25W in Step 1 the instant the 33.33W arrived at the impedance discontinuity in Step 2. This is not a transient buildup condition. If we ignore any distortion in the 33.33W Pref2 wavefront, this is an immediate event and Pref1 is immediately canceled by an equal magnitude and opposite phase Pref2(1-|rho|^2) wavefront at the moment it first arrives. You're sourcing and sinking an additional 33.33 watts, and yet the wattmeter can't discern the difference between this scenario and the 100 watt, single source scenario. But that sourcing and sinking is occurring *INSIDE* the SGCL(150). The net power inside SGCL(150) is 100W dissipated, *exactly* like the other scenario. The example illustrates perfectly the shortcomings of the idea of power flow, as well as some of the faulty conclusions that can be drawn from measurements made by a directional power meter. The shortcoming I notice is your sidestepping of the question: What happened to Pref1=25W? It just seems to have disappeared when we turned on SGCL(150) and the 33.33W wavefront arrived at the impedance discontinuity. What could have possibly made Pref1 disappear? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Conservation of Energy | Antenna |