| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
No need, I've done both transient and steady state sinusoidal solutions
for the general case many times. The source impedance dissipation and power supplied by the source can be entirely determined simply by replacing the transmission line and terminating impedance with an impedance equal to that seen looking into the input end of the line. It becomes a simple, three-component electrical circuit. You can replace the transmission line and load with any combination of length, Z0, and load impedance you'd like, as long as the input impedance is the same, creating just about any amount of "reflected power" you want, without changing the source dissipation. The "reflected power" is not dissipated in the source, matched or not. It's trivial to show that this is true. But people still want to believe. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Tarmo Tammaru wrote: Roy, I think I have the complete solution to your 70.7V generator and 1/2 wave line, but with a finite load. Part of it implies that you are correct. Part of it seem weird, even though the numbers add up. I analyzed it both as a circuit element and as a transmission line problem. Kind of long, but I'll post it if you want to see it. Tam/WB2TT "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... There are lots of problems with analyzing waves of average power bouncing around in a transmission line. I'm sure that every one of them has been pointed out many, many times in postings directed at Cecil. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Conservation of Energy | Antenna | |||