Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
Think what would have happened if you had measured the impedance at the TX end of your o/c transmission line (very high or very low, depending on the length) and replaced it with a resistor and inductor/capacitor giving the same value of R +/- jX. There's no transmission line, so no traveling waves of anything, and no reflections - just a transmitter with a very wrong value of load impedance. The 1625s would have burned up just the same. Yes, 1625's are pretty dumb but hopefully, we are smarter than the 1625's. Here's more from the IEEE dictionary. "resistance - (A) That physical property of an element, DEVICE, ... (B) The real part of impedance. Note: Definitions (A) and (B) are not equivalent ..." "resistor - A DEVICE the primary purpose of which is to introduce resistance into an electric circuit." "impedance - (B) The ratio of the ... voltage ... to the ... current ... (C) A physical DEVICE or combination of DEVICES ... Definition (C) is a second use of 'impedance' and is independent of definitions (A) and (B)." "impedor - A DEVICE, the purpose of which is to introduce impedance into an electric circuit." In your above example, you changed the circuit from a (B) impedance to an impedor. Even if the 1625's can't tell the difference, W5DXP can. :-) Note that I, not the IEEE, capitalized 'DEVICE' in the above definitions. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey, that's cool. Been a ham for 46 years, made it through Air Force
technical school, got a BSEE degree, and spent over 30 years doing circuit design without ever once coming across the term "impedor". And there it was, right in the IEEE dictionary. This newsgroup is sure educational! Roy Lewallen, W7EL W5DXP wrote: . . . "impedor - A DEVICE, the purpose of which is to introduce impedance into an electric circuit." In your above example, you changed the circuit from a (B) impedance to an impedor. Even if the 1625's can't tell the difference, W5DXP can. :-) Note that I, not the IEEE, capitalized 'DEVICE' in the above definitions. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Hey, that's cool. Been a ham for 46 years, made it through Air Force technical school, got a BSEE degree, and spent over 30 years doing circuit design without ever once coming across the term "impedor". And there it was, right in the IEEE dictionary. This newsgroup is sure educational! So what are you going to do with your new found knowledge? :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
Hey, that's cool. Been a ham for 46 years, made it through Air Force technical school, got a BSEE degree, and spent over 30 years doing circuit design without ever once coming across the term "impedor". And there it was, right in the IEEE dictionary. This newsgroup is sure educational! Maybe you missed this one also: "reactor - a device, the primary purpose of which is to introduce reactance into a circuit." If you buy 'resistor', why not 'reactor' and 'impedor'? Same concept. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
W5DXP wrote:
Even if the 1625's can't tell the difference, W5DXP can. :-) That's the whole point - the *only* difference is a conceptual one that exists inside your mind. It has no reality out here in the physical world of measuring instruments and engineering, which is the place where the 1625s live (and sometimes die). -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
W5DXP wrote: Even if the 1625's can't tell the difference, W5DXP can. :-) That's the whole point - the *only* difference is a conceptual one that exists inside your mind. BS, Ian. My pet cockroach can tell the difference between a V/I ratio resistance and a resistor. Why can't you? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Conservation of Energy | Antenna |