Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ian White, G3SEK wrote:
W5DXP wrote: Yes, but I comprehend what I am doing. For you to imply the "electrical properties don't change" between a 50 ohm dummy load and a 50 ohm dipole antenna is simply ridiculous. I didn't either say that or imply it. What's truly "ridiculous" is for you to *infer* that I did. I didn't have to infer anything, Ian, those words in quotes are *your quoted words*. Here they are again: That whole principle relies on the fact that, at the same frequency and in the steady state, the "definition of impedance" in terms of its electrical properties does *not* change. That certainly implies that there is no difference between the electrical properties of the impedance of a 50 ohm dummy load and a 50 ohm antenna. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Conservation of Energy | Antenna |