W5DXP wrote:

Jim Kelley wrote:

W5DXP wrote:
They say that reflected traveling waves disappear when steady-state is
reached. I say such a disappearing act would have to be magic.

Just hours earlier you were flinging insults at me for disputing your
claim that reflected traveling waves disappear in the steady state.

Such a bold-faced lie. I have argued loud and long with Peter (and
others) that reflected traveling waves are alive and well during the
steady-state. Peter will (hopefully) jump in and verify that fact.

You're arguing with me about it right now in another thread! :-)

Don, good luck on dueling with windmills.

I'm not trying to sell something, Bill, you are. You're trying to get
publications to buy into your energy reversal theory. You'll need lots
of luck with that.

73, ac6xg

Jim Kelley wrote:

W5DXP wrote:
Such a bold-faced lie. I have argued loud and long with Peter (and
others) that reflected traveling waves are alive and well during the
steady-state. Peter will (hopefully) jump in and verify that fact.

You're arguing with me about it right now in another thread! :-)

The statement, "Reflected traveling waves disappear in the steady state",
means to me that the set of reflected traveling waves is null in the
steady-state - which is a statement that I never made.

In a system with a mismatched load, reflected traveling waves always
exist and I have NEVER said otherwise.

Semantic tricks and traps never prove anything. They just obfuscate.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----