Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old January 26th 05, 02:14 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks Roy,
You covered every aspect
Art
"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message
...
Modeling of wires connected at an angle is a problem only with
MININEC-based programs such as AO or ELNEC, not with NEC-2 based programs
like EZNEC or most other modern programs.

The problem with wires connecting at an angle is that MININEC "cuts the
corner" -- it acts like a wire extends between about the middles of the
corner segments, rather than going clear to the corner as they should. The
problem gets less and less as the segment length gets shorter and shorter
near the junction (since the distance "cut" is less), or as the angle gets
more obtuse. There's no magic threshold where the problem suddenly occurs
(same reason). Its seriousness depends entirely on how serious a small
length error is -- it'll just shift the resonance slightly of a single
loop modeled with a moderate number of segments, but it can seriously
alter the pattern of a quad because of the sensitivity of the parasitic
element(s) to small wire length changes.

ELNEC had a way of correcting for this, called "segment length tapering",
where it would automatically convert a wire into a series of wires with
increasing segment lengths. That way you could have a very short segment
at the corner, but not have to use a large number of very short segments
for the whole antenna. That feature is still in EZNEC. It's no longer
needed for this purpose because NEC-2 doesn't have the problem, but it's
occasionally useful at other times.

You can find out more about this phenomenon in "MININEC: The Other Edge of
the Sword", in Feb. 1991 _QST_.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

art wrote:
My understanding of antenna modeling is that sharp corners or
connecting points should be avoided as they can create errors.
The question I ask is what constitutes a sharp angle ?
I am assuming that it is the capacitance at the connection is the
problem. If so
is the corner of a quad a problem or is a delta feed point on a dipole
a problem ?
I see many instances of quads being modeled and also " V" wire antennas
each without a correcting "gusset" at the corners. So when is an angle
termed to be sharp?
Regards
Art



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discone antenna plans [email protected] Antenna 13 January 14th 05 11:51 PM
significance of feedline orientation Brian Shortwave 6 October 22nd 04 01:43 AM
Simple practical designing with antenna modeling programs Richard Antenna 4 June 11th 04 02:19 AM
antenna modeling question larry d clark Antenna 1 January 29th 04 03:52 PM
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod Soliloquy Scanner 11 October 11th 03 01:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017