Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Buck (N4PGW):
I am having a difficult time finding what I thought that I said in your paraphrasing. Your bio on QRZ.COM does not indicate an interest in DX, so it is possible that all of my comments were misdirected. Perhaps the essence of what I was trying to say, in addition to agreeing with Roy, is that it is desirable with (single) horizontally polarized antennas at HF to have as much gain as possible appear in the direction that is expected to be used for DX contacts. In turn, that suggests that it is desirable to have a height above ground (or above the applicable "refection" area) be between 2 and 3 wavelengths. I do not recall writing anything about power amplifiers or something called "one way propagation." 73 Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: "Buck" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:35:21 -0500, "J. Mc Laughlin" wrote: 73 Mac N8TT Let me re-iterate what you said, assuming I understand it. Art is saying that it is better to have a more accurate TOA than the last db of antenna gain, but you are saying that a better s/n ratio (as handled by the antenna) is better than the last db of gain. snip Correct me if I am wrong here. -- Buck N4PGW |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna tuner | Antenna | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |