Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark, NM5K has raised some interesting questions. Time of day and
frequewncy? We operated almost around the clock with both broadcasting and program relay. For broadcast, the schedules are based on propagation predictions and must be published far in advance. The schedule must be followed no matter how propagation actually turns out. The best likely frequency is picked for the path. Also scheduled is something in the next lower frequency band and something in the next higher frequency band. For program relay, you can make unscheduled frequency adjustments at any time it is convenient to do so. Triple space diversity was the method we mostly used. (3) separate receiving antennas, spaced about 10 wavelengths apart laterally at 40-meters (400 meters) were used to receive all relayed programs. Each antenna fed a multicoupler so that receivers could be connected without interaction. The three receivers tuned to a particular program (not necessarily the same frequency) had their outputs fed to a single TDR combiner (Crosby or Pioneer). The combiner accepted the best output of the three receivers and rejected the other two. An operator checked the reception regularly to see if the signal could be improved by selection of either the upper or lower sideband, or other means. The height of the antennas was about 20 meters. High enough for single-hop propagation over the path at midday on the 20-meter band. We had fixed height so it had to serve from 5 MHz to 18 MHz at all hours. For relay, we adjusted frequencies almost 24-hours to pick those frequencies which were working best at the time and might also be transmitting in the next higher and/or lower band during changing conditions For relay we used 3 to 5 KW. For broadcast we used 50 KW and 100 KW. Antennas had about 15 dBd gain on both relay path ends. For broadcast we used 15 dBd gain on the transmitter. The receiver may have had a wet noodle for an antenna. If it was good enough for the jammers it was probably good enough to receive us too. Mark also wrote: "I`d bet money the vertical would win on the long paths 95% of the time." The vertical has its null directly overhead, and it has its maximum radiation at low vertical angles from the horizontal. A hazard for the vertical is low uncorrected soil conductivity benearh the antenna. Put the horizontal antenna up high and it works with either low conductivity or high conductivity soils. Low height is the hazard for the horizontal antenna if you want DX. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna tuner | Antenna | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |