Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 30th 05, 05:28 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dear Ian,

It's early in the morning. I havn't had time and I don't want to take much
time thinking about your rather slightly surprising comments.


You have completely misunderstood, gone off at a tangent, about my motives
in my very few writings on the subject of baluns.


I have never made recommendations about old-wives tales, whatever you think
they are, except, just in effect, to ignore them.


You, apparently, have now (quite mistakenly I venture to add) included
yourself amongst them.


Have you any shares in balun manufacturers? After all baluns are the only
thing left for old-wives and salesmen to haggle about. Don't bother
answering.


In conclusion, unless people can specify, in numerical terms, what is their
problem, then there's no hope of sensibly aquiring a balun of any sort. And
I have never yet met anybody who has so specified.

I feel guilty at prolonging such a trivial matter. But it's such an early
hour of the day. Havn't had breakfast yet!

A very good morning to you Ian.
---
Reg, G4FGQ


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 30th 05, 07:51 PM
Ian Jackson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Reg Edwards
writes
Dear Ian,

It's early in the morning. I havn't had time and I don't want to take much
time thinking about your rather slightly surprising comments.


You have completely misunderstood, gone off at a tangent, about my motives
in my very few writings on the subject of baluns.


I have never made recommendations about old-wives tales, whatever you think
they are, except, just in effect, to ignore them.


You, apparently, have now (quite mistakenly I venture to add) included
yourself amongst them.


Have you any shares in balun manufacturers? After all baluns are the only
thing left for old-wives and salesmen to haggle about. Don't bother
answering.


In conclusion, unless people can specify, in numerical terms, what is their
problem, then there's no hope of sensibly aquiring a balun of any sort. And
I have never yet met anybody who has so specified.

I feel guilty at prolonging such a trivial matter. But it's such an early
hour of the day. Havn't had breakfast yet!

A very good morning to you Ian.
---
Reg, G4FGQ


Evenin' Reg.
Not disagreeing with you at all. Just nit-picking about your less than
immaculate grammar!

My only problem with baluns is not understanding the obsession with the
4:1 or 9:1 transformation ratio.

73, Ian.
--

  #3   Report Post  
Old January 30th 05, 09:23 PM
Ian White, G3SEK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ian Jackson wrote:
Evenin' Reg.
Not disagreeing with you at all. Just nit-picking about your less than
immaculate grammar!

My only problem with baluns is not understanding the obsession with the
4:1 or 9:1 transformation ratio.


Reg was relying to a different Ian :-)

--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 30th 05, 09:45 PM
Ian Jackson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , "Ian White, G3SEK"
writes
Ian Jackson wrote:
Evenin' Reg.
Not disagreeing with you at all. Just nit-picking about your less than
immaculate grammar!

My only problem with baluns is not understanding the obsession with
the 4:1 or 9:1 transformation ratio.


Reg was relying to a different Ian :-)


I suspected as much when I then spotted the thread to which I was
replying in another newsgroup. Put it down to crossmodulation, or maybe
old age.
Ian.
--

  #5   Report Post  
Old January 31st 05, 07:01 AM
George, W5YR
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It is highly instructive to NOT think of a balun as an impedance
transformation device, but rather as a device which has the ability to steer
r-f currents. Thus viewed, a large amount of confusion melts away.


--
73, George W5YR
Fairview, TX

http://www.w5yr.com


"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
Dear Ian,

It's early in the morning. I havn't had time and I don't want to take

much
time thinking about your rather slightly surprising comments.


You have completely misunderstood, gone off at a tangent, about my motives
in my very few writings on the subject of baluns.


I have never made recommendations about old-wives tales, whatever you

think
they are, except, just in effect, to ignore them.


You, apparently, have now (quite mistakenly I venture to add) included
yourself amongst them.


Have you any shares in balun manufacturers? After all baluns are the only
thing left for old-wives and salesmen to haggle about. Don't bother
answering.


In conclusion, unless people can specify, in numerical terms, what is

their
problem, then there's no hope of sensibly aquiring a balun of any sort.

And
I have never yet met anybody who has so specified.

I feel guilty at prolonging such a trivial matter. But it's such an early
hour of the day. Havn't had breakfast yet!

A very good morning to you Ian.
---
Reg, G4FGQ






Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why the 4:1 or 9:1 baluns? Ian Jackson Antenna 14 February 1st 05 06:50 PM
TV type Ferrite Cores / Ferrite Cores / Magnetic Longwire Baluns (MLBs) and more RHF Shortwave 0 January 9th 05 02:06 PM
Two Shortwave Listener (SWL) 10:1 Baluns for Random Wire Antennas RHF Swap 0 October 6th 04 09:51 PM
Baluns JEFF UK Antenna 6 February 18th 04 09:01 PM
RF chokes and baluns: black magic or experimentation? Jack Twilley Antenna 4 October 1st 03 10:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017