Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Ian,
It's early in the morning. I havn't had time and I don't want to take much time thinking about your rather slightly surprising comments. You have completely misunderstood, gone off at a tangent, about my motives in my very few writings on the subject of baluns. I have never made recommendations about old-wives tales, whatever you think they are, except, just in effect, to ignore them. You, apparently, have now (quite mistakenly I venture to add) included yourself amongst them. Have you any shares in balun manufacturers? After all baluns are the only thing left for old-wives and salesmen to haggle about. Don't bother answering. In conclusion, unless people can specify, in numerical terms, what is their problem, then there's no hope of sensibly aquiring a balun of any sort. And I have never yet met anybody who has so specified. I feel guilty at prolonging such a trivial matter. But it's such an early hour of the day. Havn't had breakfast yet! A very good morning to you Ian. --- Reg, G4FGQ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Reg Edwards
writes Dear Ian, It's early in the morning. I havn't had time and I don't want to take much time thinking about your rather slightly surprising comments. You have completely misunderstood, gone off at a tangent, about my motives in my very few writings on the subject of baluns. I have never made recommendations about old-wives tales, whatever you think they are, except, just in effect, to ignore them. You, apparently, have now (quite mistakenly I venture to add) included yourself amongst them. Have you any shares in balun manufacturers? After all baluns are the only thing left for old-wives and salesmen to haggle about. Don't bother answering. In conclusion, unless people can specify, in numerical terms, what is their problem, then there's no hope of sensibly aquiring a balun of any sort. And I have never yet met anybody who has so specified. I feel guilty at prolonging such a trivial matter. But it's such an early hour of the day. Havn't had breakfast yet! A very good morning to you Ian. --- Reg, G4FGQ Evenin' Reg. Not disagreeing with you at all. Just nit-picking about your less than immaculate grammar! My only problem with baluns is not understanding the obsession with the 4:1 or 9:1 transformation ratio. 73, Ian. -- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jackson wrote:
Evenin' Reg. Not disagreeing with you at all. Just nit-picking about your less than immaculate grammar! My only problem with baluns is not understanding the obsession with the 4:1 or 9:1 transformation ratio. Reg was relying to a different Ian :-) -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , "Ian White, G3SEK"
writes Ian Jackson wrote: Evenin' Reg. Not disagreeing with you at all. Just nit-picking about your less than immaculate grammar! My only problem with baluns is not understanding the obsession with the 4:1 or 9:1 transformation ratio. Reg was relying to a different Ian :-) I suspected as much when I then spotted the thread to which I was replying in another newsgroup. Put it down to crossmodulation, or maybe old age. Ian. -- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is highly instructive to NOT think of a balun as an impedance
transformation device, but rather as a device which has the ability to steer r-f currents. Thus viewed, a large amount of confusion melts away. -- 73, George W5YR Fairview, TX http://www.w5yr.com "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... Dear Ian, It's early in the morning. I havn't had time and I don't want to take much time thinking about your rather slightly surprising comments. You have completely misunderstood, gone off at a tangent, about my motives in my very few writings on the subject of baluns. I have never made recommendations about old-wives tales, whatever you think they are, except, just in effect, to ignore them. You, apparently, have now (quite mistakenly I venture to add) included yourself amongst them. Have you any shares in balun manufacturers? After all baluns are the only thing left for old-wives and salesmen to haggle about. Don't bother answering. In conclusion, unless people can specify, in numerical terms, what is their problem, then there's no hope of sensibly aquiring a balun of any sort. And I have never yet met anybody who has so specified. I feel guilty at prolonging such a trivial matter. But it's such an early hour of the day. Havn't had breakfast yet! A very good morning to you Ian. --- Reg, G4FGQ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why the 4:1 or 9:1 baluns? | Antenna | |||
TV type Ferrite Cores / Ferrite Cores / Magnetic Longwire Baluns (MLBs) and more | Shortwave | |||
Two Shortwave Listener (SWL) 10:1 Baluns for Random Wire Antennas | Swap | |||
Baluns | Antenna | |||
RF chokes and baluns: black magic or experimentation? | Antenna |