In message , J. McLaughlin
writes
I second what George has said about Norton's papers (and those of his
associates). 1950s IRE is prob. where one should look.
At lower UHF, scattering can be an important mode. I did estimates
of these modes to predict interference to a radio-quiet site long ago.
As a general rule, lots of power needs to be involved.
At all of the frequencies, diffraction over the surface is
significant. A standard scheme was to assume that the earth had a
larger radius than is the case and them to plot LOS paths on that basis.
Used to do that with topo maps by hand correcting the height of each
contour (cutting the path) for how far away it was. The last time I did
it - to help a college radio station - I used electronic topo maps -
what progress!

I used to do it for microwave links by plotting the path on '4/3' paper.
That is, a path curved by 4/3 the earth's radius.

Mike
--
M.J.Powell

Mike Powell wrote:
"I used to do it for microwave links by plotting the paths on "4/3"
paper."

Shows that different folks use different strokes. I alwaws used K=2/3
paper. This is quite pessimistic, but my paths usually worked under
propagation conditions (early morning hours when the fog sets in) that
bent the lines of wave travel away from the earth.

I also tried hard to keep distance between repeaters closer to 20 miles
than to 30 miles. Also, when I had a choice, between 2 GHz and 6 GHz, I
chose 2 GHz.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI