| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg, G4FGQ wrote:
"It`s purely a matter of Spherical Geometry" Edmund A. Laport agrees with Reg in his book "Radio Antenna Engineering". On page 227 Ed writes: "If, for example, the computed vertical beam angle for a one-hop circuit uses 6 degrees at an azimuth of 332 degrees and the horizon in this direction consisted of a mountain range with a height of 8 degrees, the performance of the circuit would be greatly compromised by the obstruction of the mountains. In such a case it might be better to work this circuit with two hops. Then a vertical beam angle of 20 degrees can be used instead, with adequate horizon clearance for the wave path. Or if the circuit required 6 degrees for a two-hop circuit 5400 kilometers long, with the same obstruction cited, one could change to a three-hop circuit which for the same layer height would permit the use of a beam at 14 degrees." Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Radiation angle vs turns count in a coil | Antenna | |||
| Electromagnetic radiation | Shortwave | |||
| Serious radiation questin | Antenna | |||
| The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
| Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||