Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The subject on every message I saw SAID "The HIGHER the BETTER"!!!
"Buck" wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:48:27 GMT, "Dan" wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:17:15 -0500, "David 01" wrote: UNLESS you're working through repeaters and live in the valleys of a mountainous area. Then you're working bounces and if you get too high (high off the ground, but not as high as the hilltops around you), you can get up out of the signal. The discussion was a M2 HORIZONTAL loop. Not normally used with a vertically polarized repeater. Try sticking to the subject. Dan/W4NTI I didn't start the repeater discussion, I followed it. Thanks tho. Buck Buck -- For what it's worth. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Modifying KL-40 for higher input | Homebrew | |||
Can 2.4 ghz (or higher) wireless phones be monitored? | Scanner | |||
Damping Higher Harmonics on a parallel LC-Oscillator? (1 port Low-, High-, Bandpasses?) | Homebrew | |||
Damping Higher Harmonics on a parallel LC-Oscillator? (1 port Low-, High-, Bandpasses?) | Homebrew | |||
Good night for higher frequencies? | Shortwave |