Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old February 16th 05, 10:48 PM
Dan
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Buck" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:17:15 -0500, "David 01"
wrote:


UNLESS you're working through repeaters and live in the valleys of a
mountainous area. Then you're working bounces and if you get too high
(high
off the ground, but not as high as the hilltops around you), you can get
up
out of the signal.



One can also have a problem with height if the get so high as to key
multiple repeaters on a common frequency. While this is more commonly
a problem with aeronautical mobile stations, it also happens around
here for stations on hills between several repeaters or whose beams
line up with more than one repeater.

Buck

Buck
--
For what it's worth.

The discussion was a M2 HORIZONTAL loop. Not normally used with a
vertically polarized repeater. Try sticking to the subject.

Dan/W4NTI


  #12   Report Post  
Old February 16th 05, 10:49 PM
Dan
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Charlie" wrote in message
...
Raised my M2 Horizontal Loop antenna from 20ft above ground to 45ft above
ground and picked up a full S-unit (s7 to s8) at a receiving station 70
miles away. Mode was SSB and frequency was 144.200 mhz. Also my receiving
ability was enhanced dramatically....

The HIGHER the BETTER !!!!

Photos and tech info on the M2 HO Loop antenna at the site listed
below....

--

Charlie
Ham Radio - AD5TH
www.ad5th.com


Unless the feedline loss equals the gain of the added height.

Dan/W4NTI


  #13   Report Post  
Old February 17th 05, 07:23 AM
Buck
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:48:27 GMT, "Dan"
wrote:


On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:17:15 -0500, "David 01"
wrote:


UNLESS you're working through repeaters and live in the valleys of a
mountainous area. Then you're working bounces and if you get too high
(high
off the ground, but not as high as the hilltops around you), you can get
up
out of the signal.



The discussion was a M2 HORIZONTAL loop. Not normally used with a
vertically polarized repeater. Try sticking to the subject.

Dan/W4NTI


I didn't start the repeater discussion, I followed it.

Thanks tho.

Buck

Buck
--
For what it's worth.

  #14   Report Post  
Old February 17th 05, 01:18 PM
David 01
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The subject on every message I saw SAID "The HIGHER the BETTER"!!!


"Buck" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:48:27 GMT, "Dan"
wrote:


On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:17:15 -0500, "David 01"
wrote:


UNLESS you're working through repeaters and live in the valleys of a
mountainous area. Then you're working bounces and if you get too high
(high
off the ground, but not as high as the hilltops around you), you can

get
up
out of the signal.



The discussion was a M2 HORIZONTAL loop. Not normally used with a
vertically polarized repeater. Try sticking to the subject.

Dan/W4NTI


I didn't start the repeater discussion, I followed it.

Thanks tho.

Buck

Buck
--
For what it's worth.



  #15   Report Post  
Old February 17th 05, 11:45 PM
Charlie
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Dan and you make a valid point about feedline loss. I am feeding M2 HO
LOOP with 65 ft of 9914F low loss coax which incidentally enough is a
"direct bury" coax. I use a 35 ft run of 9914F for my Ringo Ranger II. I
have a 50 ft run of the same 9914F direct buried feeding my Hustler 5-BTV
vertical. At HF frequencies especially with 9914F there is virtually no loss
at 50ft.

Link for 9914F coax, jumpers and assemblies and coax loss tables. The 9914F
is within .1 db of 9913 loss figures but is more flexible and can be buried
directly into mother earth....
1. http://www.radio-ware.com

TY for making a good observation but in my case your "preaching to the
choir". Hi Hi

--

Charlie
Ham Radio - AD5TH
www.ad5th.com
Live Blues Music
www.492acousticblues.com




"Dan" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Charlie" wrote in message
...
Raised my M2 Horizontal Loop antenna from 20ft above ground to 45ft above
ground and picked up a full S-unit (s7 to s8) at a receiving station 70
miles away. Mode was SSB and frequency was 144.200 mhz. Also my receiving
ability was enhanced dramatically....

The HIGHER the BETTER !!!!

Photos and tech info on the M2 HO Loop antenna at the site listed
below....

--

Charlie
Ham Radio - AD5TH
www.ad5th.com


Unless the feedline loss equals the gain of the added height.

Dan/W4NTI






  #16   Report Post  
Old February 18th 05, 04:30 AM
Buck
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:18:40 -0500, "David 01"
wrote:

The subject on every message I saw SAID "The HIGHER the BETTER"!!!



Like so many usenet threads, this one has a fork. No big deal, at
least to me. It just happens.


Buck
--
For what it's worth.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modifying KL-40 for higher input Chris Homebrew 1 September 18th 04 03:19 AM
Can 2.4 ghz (or higher) wireless phones be monitored? SubHumanGuy Scanner 5 July 11th 04 02:20 AM
Damping Higher Harmonics on a parallel LC-Oscillator? (1 port Low-, High-, Bandpasses?) Diego Stutzer Homebrew 8 February 20th 04 08:20 PM
Damping Higher Harmonics on a parallel LC-Oscillator? (1 port Low-, High-, Bandpasses?) Diego Stutzer Homebrew 0 February 16th 04 06:35 PM
Good night for higher frequencies? Tony Meloche Shortwave 1 December 3rd 03 02:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017