Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 18th 05, 02:19 PM
Richard Fry
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Cecil Moore" wrote
Dave Platt wrote:
I believe that you could probably get a fairly effective
pattern-warping by using a non-tuned reflector which is significantly
longer than your collinear radiator.


Passive non-resonant elements have very little effect.
That's what allows a lot of multi-band beams to work.

_____________

As a point of reference, the radiation patterns of sidemounted FM broadcast
transmit arrays are affected by a non-resonant mounting structure (the
tower) -- especially for vertical polarization. Measured patterns from the
manufacturer's test ranges demonstrate this, as do the NEC-2 studies in
several of the papers on http://rfry.org .

RF

  #2   Report Post  
Old February 18th 05, 03:28 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Fry wrote:

"Cecil Moore" wrote
Passive non-resonant elements have very little effect.
That's what allows a lot of multi-band beams to work.


As a point of reference, the radiation patterns of sidemounted FM
broadcast transmit arrays are affected by a non-resonant mounting
structure (the tower) -- especially for vertical polarization.


True, and please note that I was talking about *antenna
elements* not support structures.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #3   Report Post  
Old February 18th 05, 05:12 PM
Richard Fry
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
Richard Fry wrote:

"Cecil Moore" wrote
Passive non-resonant elements have very little effect.
That's what allows a lot of multi-band beams to work.


As a point of reference, the radiation patterns of sidemounted FM
broadcast transmit arrays are affected by a non-resonant mounting
structure (the tower) -- especially for vertical polarization.


True, and please note that I was talking about *antenna
elements* not support structures.

___________________

But geing closer to the driven element(s), probably even non-resonant
antenna elements may have more affect on the net antenna pattern than that
produced by a supporting tower further away.

RF

  #4   Report Post  
Old February 18th 05, 06:16 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Fry wrote:
But geing closer to the driven element(s), probably even non-resonant
antenna elements may have more affect on the net antenna pattern than
that produced by a supporting tower further away.


Using EZNEC, one can observe that the current in a
closer non-resonant passive antenna element can be
pretty low while the current in a grounded tower
further away can be pretty high.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #5   Report Post  
Old February 18th 05, 06:58 PM
Dave Platt
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I believe that you could probably get a fairly effective
pattern-warping by using a non-tuned reflector which is significantly
longer than your collinear radiator.


Passive non-resonant elements have very little effect.
That's what allows a lot of multi-band beams to work.


As a point of reference, the radiation patterns of sidemounted FM broadcast
transmit arrays are affected by a non-resonant mounting structure (the
tower) -- especially for vertical polarization. Measured patterns from the
manufacturer's test ranges demonstrate this, as do the NEC-2 studies in
several of the papers on http://rfry.org .


Check... that's just the sort of situation I was thinking of.

The effect on the pattern isn't all that strong, though... only a few
dB. As one example, the old ARRL VHF book gives the plans for a
four-bay stacked dipole antenna system. With the dipoles placed on
four sides of the mast, the antenna system has a gain of about 6 dB
(they don't say dBi or dBd but I assume it must be the latter). With
all four dipoles on the same side of the mast, the pattern is said to
be a cardioid of about 9 dB gain.

They don't say how deep the back-side null is. The cardioid pattern
might have a high enough F/B ratio to help with the original poster's
situation (mountain-side reflection), or he might need to use a tuned
reflector of the 5%-longer-than-resonant variety to get a more
directional pattern.

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GRAYLAND 2004 FALL DXPEDITION: Compiled Logs for Oct 15-17 (Part 1) 4nradio Shortwave 4 November 1st 04 11:44 PM
That pesky 7238 kHz CW signal John Walton Homebrew 14 September 19th 04 03:16 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 04:01 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Shortwave 16 December 13th 03 04:01 PM
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna Ashhar Farhan Homebrew 0 September 18th 03 05:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017