| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was wondering, aside from the obvious , what the trade-offs might be
between a moderately priced manual tuner (example: Palstar AT1KM) and a auto tuner such as the LDG AT-100 Pro or the soon to be released AT-200 Pro I guess it is obvious that you have more control with the manual tuner and are more likely to achieve a match with minimal inductance..(or losses) Not famliar enough with these auto tuners to know if that try to replicate a low-loss match that you can genarally achieve with a manual tuner or not..... Would appreciate any helpful comments |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| MFJ vs SGC automatic antenna tuners?? | Antenna | |||
| FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Boatanchors | |||
| FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Equipment | |||
| FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Equipment | |||
| FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Swap | |||