Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Brannick" wrote in message ... I was wondering, aside from the obvious , what the trade-offs might be between a moderately priced manual tuner (example: Palstar AT1KM) and a auto tuner such as the LDG AT-100 Pro or the soon to be released AT-200 Pro I guess it is obvious that you have more control with the manual tuner and are more likely to achieve a match with minimal inductance..(or losses) Not famliar enough with these auto tuners to know if that try to replicate a low-loss match that you can genarally achieve with a manual tuner or not..... Would appreciate any helpful comments Manual tuners tend to have a much wider range of conditions under which they can achieve a match. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MFJ vs SGC automatic antenna tuners?? | Antenna | |||
FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Boatanchors | |||
FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Equipment | |||
FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Equipment | |||
FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Swap |