Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan wrote:
More is not always better. As far as performance goes, some have suggested that your antenna pattern can have more lobes (a bad thing) if you went with the 100' of wire vs. the 88'. Having a very lobey pattern makes it hard to determine where your signal is actually going, whereas having less lobes usually means your signal will radiate at 90 degree angles to the doublet antenna. EZNEC predicts the pattern very well. And the reason Mr. Varney, G5RV, chose 102 ft. for his 20m antenna was to take advantage of the beautiful cloverleaf pattern that allows me to hit Europe, Central/South America, New Zealand and the Far East with 10 dBi lobes without rotating my antenna. Quite often, my fixed G5RV beats my rotatable dipole. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
88 ft + 66 ft fanned doublet? | Antenna | |||
88 ft. Doublet Question | Antenna | |||
G5RV or 135 foot doublet or Carolina Windom? | Antenna | |||
Question on antenna symantics | Antenna | |||
Feeding a doublet | Antenna |