Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 24th 03, 07:06 PM
Bill VanAlstyne
 
Posts: n/a
Default W5GI "Mystery" Antenna

I'm interested in knowing if anyone has modeled, built, and/or tested the
W5GI multiband antenna described in July 2003 CQ magazine. I'm especially
interested in any experience mounting the antenna in inverted-V fashion,
rather than as a flat-top T.

For those who haven't seen the article, the W5GI is constructed using two
physical 1/4-wave lengths of coax, center-to-braid shorted on the far ends,
as the middle 1/4-wave segment in each leg of the antenna. These coax
segments are supposed to provide the phase reversal necessary for the
collinear design, and also act as part of the collinear radiator set. (The
phasing stubs often used when building a wire collinear are not employed
here.) Since the coax segments are not phase-reversing on other bands, the
antenna is supposed to act as a G5RV on bands pther than 20M. I'm
principally interested in its performance on 20M, since the G5RV's theory
and characteristics of operation have been extensively discussed elsewhere.

Supposedly, people attempting to model this antenna using available software
tools have come up with disparate results. The author claims that numerous
people have built and used the antenna on 20M and have been impressed with
its performance. The major lobes supposedly occur broadside to the wire, as
one would expect with a collinear.

The "mystery" here, as I understand it, is whether the coax segments
actually do act as 180-degree phase-reversing elements, and if so, why the
antenna seems to work correctly only when the coax elements are cut to a
physical quarter weavelength (16.5 ft) rather than to an electrical quarter
wavelength. (It's easy to see why this is true when the antenna is operated
as a G5RV on others bands -- but what about when operating as a 20M
collinear?)

Bill / W5WVO


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 25th 03, 10:58 PM
David L Thompson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill,

Its in the class with the double or double extended zepp with about 2 to
2.5 dbd gain. I think LB W4RNL is either adding it or plans to add it to
his web page. Its a broadside antenna using two half waves to add gain to
the figure 8 on the fundamental frequency (say 17 or 20). There is a null
off the ends but mounted low its only a few DB at most. The efficiency his
very high and the antenna is no mystery to antenna buffs. Just a novel way
of generating the double zepp.
73 Dave K4JRB

Bill VanAlstyne wrote in message
...
I'm interested in knowing if anyone has modeled, built, and/or tested the
W5GI multiband antenna described in July 2003 CQ magazine. I'm especially
interested in any experience mounting the antenna in inverted-V fashion,
rather than as a flat-top T.

For those who haven't seen the article, the W5GI is constructed using two
physical 1/4-wave lengths of coax, center-to-braid shorted on the far

ends,
as the middle 1/4-wave segment in each leg of the antenna. These coax
segments are supposed to provide the phase reversal necessary for the
collinear design, and also act as part of the collinear radiator set. (The
phasing stubs often used when building a wire collinear are not employed
here.) Since the coax segments are not phase-reversing on other bands, the
antenna is supposed to act as a G5RV on bands pther than 20M. I'm
principally interested in its performance on 20M, since the G5RV's theory
and characteristics of operation have been extensively discussed

elsewhere.

Supposedly, people attempting to model this antenna using available

software
tools have come up with disparate results. The author claims that numerous
people have built and used the antenna on 20M and have been impressed with
its performance. The major lobes supposedly occur broadside to the wire,

as
one would expect with a collinear.

The "mystery" here, as I understand it, is whether the coax segments
actually do act as 180-degree phase-reversing elements, and if so, why the
antenna seems to work correctly only when the coax elements are cut to a
physical quarter weavelength (16.5 ft) rather than to an electrical

quarter
wavelength. (It's easy to see why this is true when the antenna is

operated
as a G5RV on others bands -- but what about when operating as a 20M
collinear?)

Bill / W5WVO




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Ten-tec vee beam Tom Coates Antenna 8 September 21st 03 12:47 AM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017