Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Art
In my experience (or maybe its just anecdotal) F/B ratios are very frequency dependent for high dB numbers. You might for example get 28dB F/B on 14.100 but it may drop to 15dB 100kHz away. The forward gain in this case doesnt change much at all. How would you then advertise this except by a graph? Keep in mind also that F/B is expressed in a specific direction. 5-10 degrees off that and you will see the numbers fall off. Max F/B rarely occurs at max forward gain... Front to side is also good for attenuating signals you dont want. (Assuming horiz polarisation) If I was tackling this as a project I'd start defining some parameters like 3dB beamwidth and the maximum unwanted lobe figures. Then plug it into a modeling program (like 4nec2) I havent played much with modelling but I assume that the optimising tools could do the trial and error calcs for you. You are aiming for an antenna with moderate forward gain but as low as possible radiation/reception in other directions.. In fact if you havent tried modelling it is well worth it just to see the effect on the patterns. You can also tune a (yagi/quad) reflector remotely if you want to peak the F/B Probably not what you were after sorry... Cheers Bob VK2YQA (In Oz...) wrote: Regarding antenners, thats right,antennas. Plenty of listings for various gains achieved with antennas but I have not seen any similar listings for F/R and F/B. Is there any around so I can see what can be or has been attained or is blocking of rear signals of little consequence for todays hams. I can see that being true for when the band has just opened and propagation has not opened to the rear or with net operations so perhaps gain is every thing after all. It is my opinion that if interest/efforts are increased first in deflecting the rear action to the front first and thereby INCREASING the front lobe width there will be more opportunities for increasing gains without the side lobes and narrow forward lobes that accompany Yagi's. as well as shorter booms. ( more deflectors/reflectors perhaps) ( no religeous, porno or genocide preaching please, fighting to see which is best could take place on boat anchor nets to see which has taken position of the lowest level) Regards Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FT817 front vs. rear connector | Equipment | |||
FT817 front vs. rear connector | Equipment | |||
FT817 front vs. rear connector | Equipment | |||
[OT] Smear campaign against John Kerry | Boatanchors | |||
BC155 rear port | Scanner |