Allan Herriman wrote:
S22 is fairly well defined.

What's the S22 of an IC-756PRO?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Cecil Moore" wrote
Allan Herriman wrote:
S22 is fairly well defined.

What's the S22 of an IC-756PRO?

=============================

Cecil, I havn't the foggiest idea what an IC-756PRO is except that it is
something which comes from that excellent manufacturer Icom.

But your extremely brief question is the most hillarious ever asked on this
newsgroup. You are still at the best of your form. I can't stop laughing.

The best I could do is ask what is the S22 of a 6J5. One thing for certain,
it is not mentioned in manufacturer's data sheets. Yet ARRL simple PA design
rules manage very well without it.
----
Yours, Reg.

I read in sci.electronics.design that Reg Edwards
wrote (in .
com) about 'Say what you mean.', on Sat, 26 Feb 2005:

The best I could do is ask what is the S22 of a 6J5. One thing for
certain, it is not mentioned in manufacturer's data sheets. Yet ARRL
simple PA design
rules manage very well without it.

You wouldn't expect to use scattering parameters for a 6J5. But change
that to 7194 and the question is not so facetious. (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk