Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Cecil Moore wrote:
Ken Smith wrote: Now lets assume that you slightly decrease the resistance. Since we are assuming that this is a well designed case, we can assume that the designer took steps to ensure that the output devices would be protected from excess currents. Let's assume the designer is an amateur who didn't provide any protection for his tube's output. The lower the resistive load, the more current the output device draws until it fails. What is the output impedance of the device? At the point where it fails, the output goes to zero, I assume. If so, wouldn't that be the impedance as I've been defining it. -- -- forging knowledge |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
X-terminator antenna | CB | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner |