Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Woodgate wrote:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Tom Ring wrote (in ) about '1/4 vs 1/2 wavelength antenna', on Fri, 4 Mar 2005: Also ignoring the ***voice-coil resistance***. If that is included, as it must be for a correct analysis, you get 2. F Langford-Smith 'invented' the concept of damping factor, and around 1949 accepted the point made by James Moir that, by not properly taking into account the effect of the voice-coil resistance, it was a seriously misleading concept. Yes, 60 years later, people are still being misled. Good point. I stand corrected. The only nit I would pick would be that impedance be used, since you need to measure it at the frequency(ies) in question, not DC. And then there is that pesky crossover in most systems. Personally I like biamping. tom K0TAR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
X-terminator antenna | CB | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner |