Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:19:26 GMT, "
wrote: Now say we have another antenna with a single feed that has a TOA of 10 degrees with the same gain as the big yagi !. Hi Art, Simply using EZNEC's freely available yagi design, I can come up with a 11.4 dBi figure at 10 degrees. Can you say we have another antenna with a single feed that has a TOA of 10 degrees with more gain that this? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think there would be a problem in beating that!
I would expect many could come up with one better than that at a feed point height of 1 wave length. Isn't the max gain theoretical obtainable just short of 16dbi ? Allow for 0.5 db max losses seems like 15.5 dbi is obtainable. ( using perfect flat terrain ofcourse with a 60 foot boom 'big' yagi) With all the experts that reside on this group plus a zillion of antenna reference books I expect many to come up with antennas better than that. Isn';t all now known about antennas and placed in print? (Grin) It just needs is a bit of research or an expert to share his knowledge with civility. Art "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:19:26 GMT, " wrote: Now say we have another antenna with a single feed that has a TOA of 10 degrees with the same gain as the big yagi !. Hi Art, Simply using EZNEC's freely available yagi design, I can come up with a 11.4 dBi figure at 10 degrees. Can you say we have another antenna with a single feed that has a TOA of 10 degrees with more gain that this? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:33:41 GMT, "
wrote: I expect many to come up with antennas better than that. Hi Art, Thanx, I just needed you to confirm that you, in fact, did not have such a design. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you really think that I wasn't wise to the games you play ?
You was gearing up for an augument so I gave you nothing you could argue about. Check mate ! Art "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:33:41 GMT, " wrote: I expect many to come up with antennas better than that. Hi Art, Thanx, I just needed you to confirm that you, in fact, did not have such a design. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 20:42:10 GMT, "
wrote: Do you really think that I wasn't wise to the games you play ? You was gearing up for an augument so I gave you nothing you could argue about. Now THAT sounds like playing games, when I ask for a technical specification in a technical newsgroup. Check mate ! as does that. Hi Art, It remains extremely difficult to separate these obscure postings which defy distinction between your work and your fantasies, Art. This recent introduction of TOA appears to have been fantasy. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|