RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   MFJ-974H Balanced Line Tuner (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/668-mfj-974h-balanced-line-tuner.html)

JGBOYLES November 3rd 03 12:23 AM

You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation.

Bob, this guy is obviously a mental case, and there is nothing to be gained
getting our blood pressure up trying to reason with him. I am not.
73 Gary N4AST

Ed November 3rd 03 01:14 AM

Go back and read the posts. The jerk comment belongs to "Bob" so you
apparently believe that Bob is a mental case.

How about if the both of you go insult each other elsewhere and leave the
thread alone so the many folks following the thread will eventually get some
good information on this tuner and not have to read through all of your
nonsense ? Please.

Ed


"JGBOYLES" wrote in message
...
You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation.


Bob, this guy is obviously a mental case, and there is nothing to be

gained
getting our blood pressure up trying to reason with him. I am not.
73 Gary N4AST




sideband November 3rd 03 01:23 AM

What's to follow.. You asked about a product not released yet, people
informed you (whether you knew yet or not) that it wasn't released
yet, then you proceeded to act the ass and tell them they're
speculating (even though they were attempting to not speculate on the
product). Seems fairly easy to follow to me. And besides, there's
still no information on said tuner.

Seems to me you posted this thread as trollbait, because you're one of
those twisted individuals who gets his rocks off calling people names
and holding the "high" ground.

Go lay down by your bowl.

-SSB

Ed wrote:

Go back and read the posts. The jerk comment belongs to "Bob" so you
apparently believe that Bob is a mental case.

How about if the both of you go insult each other elsewhere and leave the
thread alone so the many folks following the thread will eventually get some
good information on this tuner and not have to read through all of your
nonsense ? Please.

Ed


"JGBOYLES" wrote in message
...

You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation.


Bob, this guy is obviously a mental case, and there is nothing to be


gained

getting our blood pressure up trying to reason with him. I am not.
73 Gary N4AST






CW November 3rd 03 01:29 AM

plonk.


"Ed" wrote in message
...
Aaaahhhhhhh, another speculator who can't resist fouling a good thread and
wasting bandwidth in these groups. You and the other guy know nothing and
feel the need to prove it here for some reason. Now that you've done that
please run along. There are people checking this thread for information

and
all they find is your uninformative crap. You have nothing to add so

please
go back to posting in your porn NG's or whatever it is you like to do.

And
while your posting in alt.whack.whack.whack consider this - not everyone

of
these units goes out the "front door" - people get them as evaluation

units
and they may get them before the readers of alt.whack.whack.whack such as
yourself get them. If no one has any information on it - thats OK too -

I'm
not worried.

Now seriously ... GO AWAY.


"Bob Miller" speculated that : blah, blah,

blah





CW November 3rd 03 01:33 AM

There is this really great feature in Outlook (not Express). When plonk
someone, it removes all traces of him from the thread.
Bob, plonk this guy. You are arguing with an idiot.


"Bob Miller" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 09:03:01 -0500, "Ed" wrote:



Now seriously ... GO AWAY.

You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation.

Bob
k5qwg






sideband November 3rd 03 02:49 AM



Ed wrote:

So Gary calls Bob a jerk yet they still have *no* information.
CW and SSB also chime in with *no* information. Is your buddy "RTTY" going
to chime in with *no* information also ?

Are your lives so empty you need to respond to a post where you have nothing
to contribute ?


is yours so empty you have to start a thread just so you can insult
people?

If you don't think anyone has access to the tuner (more of your speculation)
than just don't respond - the thread will die by itself. You're wasting
the time of everyone following the thread who is hoping that someone will
post a review as soon as they get their hands on one.

So go away - please. Theres no one trolling here other than you
know-it-all's (i.e. speculate-on-everything's).


Look! The troll is calling someone else a troll. Go figure. Guess it
takes one to know one. Want to throw any more elementary school yard
tactics around?

Bad Dog. No Biscuit.

-SSB


Bob Miller November 3rd 03 03:58 AM

On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 09:03:01 -0500, "Ed" wrote:



Now seriously ... GO AWAY.

You really are a jerk. And that is not speculation.

Bob
k5qwg




Budman November 14th 03 04:38 PM

"Ed" wrote:

Aaaahhhhhhh, another speculator who can't resist fouling a good thread and
wasting bandwidth in these groups. You and the other guy know nothing and
feel the need to prove it here for some reason. Now that you've done that
please run along. There are people checking this thread for information and
all they find is your uninformative crap. You have nothing to add so please
go back to posting in your porn NG's or whatever it is you like to do. And
while your posting in alt.whack.whack.whack consider this - not everyone of
these units goes out the "front door" - people get them as evaluation units
and they may get them before the readers of alt.whack.whack.whack such as
yourself get them. If no one has any information on it - thats OK too - I'm
not worried.

Now seriously ... GO AWAY.


"Bob Miller" speculated that : blah, blah, blah


I'm thinking of buying a 2005 Camry for my daughter when she graduates next
year. Any one out there have any actual hands on experience on that vehicle.

Sheez


Dave Shrader November 14th 03 05:11 PM

Budman wrote:

SNIP
I'm thinking of buying a 2005 Camry for my daughter when she graduates next
year. Any one out there have any actual hands on experience on that vehicle.

Sheez


YES!! The test engineers for Camry drove it about 1 year ago! It was
part of the design and development cycle.

Does that mean that someone from MFJ may have tested the new tuner??

I would guess so. But, [s]he may not be at liberty to make a public comment.

Anyway this thread begs the issue.

Deacon Dave



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com